Wednesday, May 12, 2010

who destroyed The Bhagavata Revolution

Home
About
Archives
Contributors
Contact Us
Indian Skeptic
Log In

Blog
Featured Posts
General News
God Watch
Con-Alert
Paranormal
Pseudoscience
Science P.O.V.
Culture
Ethics
Naturalism
Social Action
Creative Arts
Debunked
Humor
Legal Pad
Q & A
Secular Events
Video
Writers
Ajita Kamal
Babu Gogineni
Kedar Kulkarni
Manoj TV
Meera Nanda
Nalini Hebbar
Narendra Nayak
Pankaj Kulkarni
Prabir Ghosh
Siddharth Singh
Srinivas Kakkilaya
Sumitra Padmanavan
Sundeep Peswani
Tom Clark
Vinod Kumar Wadhawan
Categorized | Debunked, God Watch
Subterfuge: How Brahmins Destroyed The Bhagavata Revolution
Written by Prabhakar Kamath , Posted on 14 March 2010
Tags: Bhagavata, Bhakti, Brahmanism, destroyed, hinduism, Krishna, revolution
In the previous article, we read how Bhagavatism, the religion centered on Krishna-Vaasudeva, promised people that if they took refuge in him, he would fulfill their desires (9:22) and liberate them from all evils of Brahmanism, namely doctrine of the Gunas of Prakriti (7:14), Law of Karma (9:28), and Shokam, Dwandwam and Samsara (arising from Karmaphalam). In other words, this Dharma’s goal was to end the elitist Brahmanism obsessed with Kamya Karma (corrupted Yajnas) and hierarchical Varna Dharma (class and caste system), and establish in its place Bhagavatism resting on ritual-free Bhaktiyoga (9:26) and equality of all classes based on the premise that the same god resided in everyone’s heart (10:20; 15:15). The essence of Bhagavata Dharma as well as its revolution to overthrow Brahmanism was stated in the form of a Sutra -the Secret Code of the Bhagavad Gita: 18:66: Abandon all Dharma and surrender unto me alone; I shall liberate you from all evil (aspects of Brahmanism). Do not grieve (for its demise).

In this article, we will study how Brahmins converted ‘The Manifesto Of The Revolution To Overthrow Brahmanism’ into ‘The Handbook Of Brahmanism’; and literally beat a petrified Krishna over his head with thoroughly corrupted form of Bhakti. Such is the genius of Brahmanism.

1. Brahmanism’s Predicament

After Bhagavatas took over the Gita, decadent Brahmanism found itself in great quandary. Accepting Krishna’s recommendation meant certain death for ritual-obsessed Brahmanism. Brahmins made their living by performing complicated Kamya Karma for Kshatriyas as well as other classes obsessed with gaining wealth, power and heaven, and maintained their high status in the society by being the creators, interpreters and guardians of sacred scriptures. If Brahmanism were to survive, they must accept Bhagavata Dharma but somehow subvert its anti-Brahmanic tenor and Brahmanize Bhakti.

2. Extreme Editing

Brahmanic loyalists always had two secret weapons in their armory by which they dealt with their opponent’s literature: Destroying the literature they hated, and interpolating pro-Brahmanism verses into the literature they feared. In the case of the Bhagavad Gita, however, they could not resort to either of these tactics for fear of getting their “heads crushed to powder and stuck in the gap between the Krishna’s teeth.” Nor did they want to be like the “moths rushing headlong into the blazing fire for their destruction.” They had no choice but to come up with a new tactic, which looked perfectly innocent and legitimate to the naïve: Extreme editing.

The goal of extreme editing was nothing short of Mission Impossible: To convert ‘The Manifesto of Bhagavata Revolution to Overthrow Brahmanism’ into ‘The Standard Handbook of Brahmanism.’ This meant:
Hiding two successive revolutions to overthrow Brahmanism.
Hiding the fact that decadence of Brahmanism was the cause widespread Shokam, Dwandwam and obsession with Karmaphalam.
Preserving all aspects of Brahmanism: The doctrines of the Gunas of Prakriti and Law of Karma; Varna Dharma based on these doctrines; Yajnas to fulfill desires and protection from evil; supremacy of Brahmins, and sanctity of the Vedas.
Creating the false impression that the Bhagavad Gita represented one consistent philosophy without any internal conflict.
Hiding the fact that Bhagavad Gita identified Brahmanism as the evil.
Hypothetically this was no different than Germans resorting to extreme editing of a book titled ‘The History of World War II: How Americans and Allies Defeated Germans.’ If one reads this hyper-edited hypothetical book, one would find no evidence of World War II, and Germans, Americans and British are all portrayed as living in perfect harmony as brothers. Who were the ‘Gestapo’ the original authors were referring to in this book? Well, they were some unknown demons that came to the earth from another planet.

Extreme editing resulted in the text of the Bhagavad Gita coming across as incoherent, repetitive, illogical, confusing, self-contradicting and almost incomprehensible. This did not bother the editors one bit because it served the purpose of Brahmanic loyalists extremely well, indeed. Obfuscation and confusion are the strategies of all frauds that want to hide their misdeeds. They simply passed a dictum that the Bhagavad Gita should not be studied except under the supervision of a Guru. And they lined up a whole cadre of Gurus to bewilder even the most erudite among scholars. Here are various editorial steps they took to conceal the true intent and spirit of the Bhagavad Gita:

A. Isolating Anti-Brahmanic Shlokas

Brahmanic editors neutralized the impact of Krishna’s harshest criticism of Vedic ritualists by putting those shlokas in Chapter Sixteen, innocently titled ‘The Yoga of Division Between The Divine and Demonical.’ This chapter consists of shlokas chastising Kshatriyas (16:11-20) and scolding Brahmins (16:21-24) in the harshest language possible. We read these shlokas in the previous article. Chapter Sixteen should have followed Chapter Seventeen as it contained harsh response to the resurgent Brahmanism’s shlokas 17:1-4; 7-28. By putting Chapter Sixteen before Chapter Seventeen, no one could know whom Krishna was scolding. Just in case anyone wondered who were these “cruel haters, worst among men and evildoers” whom Krishna threatened with “eternal damnation in the wombs of demons,” they created elaborate myths of various demons that Krishna killed during his illustrious career as Slayer of Foes (2:4). However, they could not explain why in the face of Magadha king Jarasandha’s repeated attacks the great Slayer of Foes fled Mathura lock, stock and barrel, and retreated to Dwaraka, which was as far to the southwest from Mathura as he could go! In this particular case Brahmins could not go back and rewrite Mahabharata without looking rather stupid.

B. Switching Chapters To Confuse Readers

They switched the order of presentation of chapters Three and Four. Logically Chapter Four should have preceded Chapter Three as Guru Krishna announces in that chapter that he takes birth whenever there is decay of Dharma and rise of Adharma to reestablish Dharma, and to protect the good and destroy the evildoers (4:7-8). Also Chapter Four begins with Lord Krishna announcing that it was he who taught Sun god the imperishable Yoga referred to in Chapter Two. Besides, Chapter Three starts with references (3:1-2) to issues raised in Chapter Four, as if it followed Chapter Four. For example, he refers to himself as the Lord of beings who gave to the world two paths of Yoga (3:3). This switch of chapters created a whole lot of confusion in readers, which served Brahmins well. Now they could brainwash people by means of long-winded explanations, which, luckily, never fail to put one to sleep.

C. Scrambling Chapters

The Brahmanic editors carefully scrambled chapters belonging to the three separate sects, making it almost impossible to figure out their chronology. Chronologically all Bhagavata chapters (Seven, Nine, Ten, Eleven, Twelve and Sixteen) should have come after all resurgent Brahmanic chapters (parts of Fourteen, Seventeen and parts of Eighteen). Unless the reader is thoroughly familiar with the three distinct pairs of doctrines of the three distinct Dharmas, he is certain to be thoroughly bewildered by this Brahmanic sleight of hand. For example, most students of the Gita do not know that Krishna retired Brahman and replaced him with himself.

D. Scattering Shlokas

They scattered Brahmanic, Upanishadic and Bhagavata shlokas all over the text in bits and pieces. Shlokas on Prakriti and Purusha were scattered incongruously in chapters Eight (8:4, 8-10, 22), Thirteen (13:1-23) and Chapter Fifteen (15:16-18). They scattered shlokas promoting the Gunas over three chapters (3:5, 27, 33; 14:5-18; 18:17, 18:40-45, 59-60). They scattered Bhagavata shlokas into essentially Upanishadic chapters (2:61; 3:22-23; 4:3, 9-11). Unless one is thoroughly familiar with the distinct core doctrines of these three Dharmas, one would be totally bewildered. This, of course, was the goal of the final editor.

E. Using Opponent’s Shlokas To Legitimize Their Own

The final Brahmanic editors of the Bhagavad Gita deviously attempted to legitimize the doctrine of the Gunas by transposing the following four Bhagavata shlokas (14:1-4) before the fourteen Brahmanic shlokas (14:5-18) embellishing the three Gunas. These four Bhagavata shlokas most likely preceded shlokas 7:4-14 dealing with Bhagavata Krishna’s Lower and Higher Prakriti. By doing so, they created the illusion that Krishna was telling the readers that the Knowledge of the Gunas helped one to attain Moksha. The main goal, however, was to establish supremacy of Brahmins (14:6, 11, 14, 18).

14:1-4: Lord Krishna said: I shall again declare that supreme knowledge, the best of all forms of knowledge; by knowing which, all the sages have passed from this world to the highest perfection (attained Moksha). They, who, having devoted themselves to this knowledge, have attained to unity with Me (attained Moksha), are neither born at the time of creation, nor are they disturbed at the time of dissolution. My womb is the Mahat Brahma (Prakriti); in that I place the germ; thence, O Bharata, is the birth of all beings. Whatever forms are produced, O Kaunteya, in any wombs whatsoever, the great Brahma (Prakriti) is their womb, I the seed giver.
Naïve readers could believe that the above four shlokas were meant to say that Knowledge of the Gunas led to Moksha. How do we know that this tactic was blatantly deceptive? Well, read shlokas 14:19-27. These nine shlokas describe these very Gunas as evil, recommend that they should not be allowed to move one, and that one could transcend them by taking refuge in the Lord.

3. Beating Krishna Over His Head With Ritualized Bhakti

Pretending to be great Bhaktas of Krishna, Brahmins infiltrated the Bhagavata Dharma. They deleted Yoga (Sanyasa and Tyaga) from Bhaktiyoga, and attached Yajna to Bhakti. Since Krishna hated Yajna (11:48), they introduced Yajna in its disguised form: Pooja. They replaced the detachment from sense objects part (Sanyasa) of Yoga with attachment to wealth, power and heaven. They replaced the renunciation of fruits of Yajna (Tyaga) with desire to gain these fruits by Pooja. In other words, just as they corrupted selfless Yajna (Nishkama Karma) into selfish Yajna (Kamya Karma, 2:43), they corrupted selfless Bhakti into selfish Bhakti (Kamya Bhakti). Now in this corrupted form of Bhakti, which I refer to as Bhaktipooja, one dedicates mindless rituals to various gods with the intention of gaining money, power, title, promotion, son, son-in-law, heaven, etc. seeking protection from evil.

In this Brahmanized Bhagavata Dharma, Brahmanism no longer identified itself as the evil. So they had to invent new evil. Now the evil was some unseen misfortune (Adrashta). They created obstacles (Vighna) produced by unknown evil forces. They created a whole new god -Ganesha- to take care of any Adrishta and Vighna. Thus another money spinning business was invented. Then they came up with bad planetary movements (Grahachara) as the cause of misfortunes. Now Astrology became a “science” by which thousands of Astrologers made their living. Then Brahmins started spinning more and more superstitions so people could perform various rituals to ward of evil spirits. So thousands of superstitions sprouted across India the sole goal of which was for Brahmins to make money. Today crooked Brahmins routinely dupe even highly educated Hindus into performing various fraudulent and worthless rituals.

A. Taking Krishna Literally

When Bhagavata Krishna rhetorically said, “Whoever offers me with devotion a leaf, a flower, a fruit or water, I accept that as the pious offering of the pure in heart (9:26),” he was merely telling Vedic ritualists “Bhakthi -sincere devotion with purity of heart- is more important than ostentatious rituals. If you feel compelled to offer me something as a symbol of your Bhakthi, just a leaf, a flower, a fruit or even a spoonful of water would do. Even poor people could afford them.” To those who insisted on performing Yajna he said: 9:27: “Whatever (Yajna) you do, whatever (remnant) you eat, whatever (material) you offer in Yajna, whatever (customary) gift you give away, whatever Tapas (austerity) you practice, do it as an offering to me and no one else, for I am the enjoyer and lord of all Yajna (9:24).”

This was all these ritual-obsessed Brahmins needed to hear.

B. Yajna Infiltrates Bhakti In Disguised Forms

Since Krishna was nowhere to be seen, they created idol to represent him. Now a whole new business venture began: Carving idols of Krishna in clay, wood and stone.
To house these idols they built temples of mud bricks, wood and stone, which became increasingly ornate over the centuries. Now temple building business gave a lot of people jobs. Just as they convinced kings in ancient times to perform ostentatious Yajnas, Brahmins convinced various kings to build magnificent temples dedicated to gods such as the ones in Belur in Karnataka, Puri in Orissa and Tanjavoor in Tamil Nadu. Some of these temples stand to this day as testament to man’s creative energy motivated by devotion.
They replaced worship by Yajna with worship by Pooja. The Poojari (priest) warmed the idol by moving the fire of Aarthi round and round in front of it.
Since Krishna told them to offer him leaves, flowers and fruits, they offered him Tulasi leaves, marigold, coconuts and bananas during the Pooja service.
In the place of remnant (Yajnashista) of Yajna, they distributed Prasadam of Pooja for devotees to eat.
Since water was needed to wash Prasadam down devotee’s throat, they served Theerth, sacred water, which they generously adulterated with cow’s urine. Why cow’s urine? Well, the cow was the living symbol of cowherd Krishna, and since Krishna’s urine was not available, cow’s urine would do just as well.
Since Krishna asked them to offer him water, they started giving his idol baths several times a day, which they called Abhisheka. They built ponds next to temples to assure regular water supply.
After the bath with the dirty temple pond water, they anointed his idol with sandalwood and Chandan paste as deodorizer.
Following Krishna’s instruction in 9:27, before every meal, they said “Krishnarpana” (”I offer this meal to Krishna”).
Since Krishna said that donations that were customarily made to Brahmins after Yajna should be made as an offering to him, they installed a big donation box in front of god’s image in every temple. You see, temples need a lot of money to keep Krishna bathed, clothed, fed and protected. They made provision for tips for Poojaris also. Poojaris sat at the foot of the idol with plates holding coins and notes, seeking tax-free donation in Krishna’s name.
They offered a small amount of sandalwood paste to devotees to apply it over their forehead as Nama, the symbol of Krishna’s name. Thus Nama became the outward sign of every Bhakta of Brahmin Krishna.
Instead of chanting Vedic Mantras, they told devotees to chant Krishna’s name bobbing their heads left and right, which they titled Bhajan, meaning devotional singing, “Hare Rama, Hare Krishna…”
4. Bhakti Rituals Become Ostentatious

Now greed sprouted in the hearts of Brahmins. Just as in the ancient times Yajnas became more and more ostentatious, Bhaktipooja also became more and more ostentatious. Brahmins tempted rich people to sponsor ostentatious rituals in the temple. They gave devotees a long list of complicated Poojas, Abhishekas and other rituals with a price tag.

On the pretext of displaying their extreme Bhakti for Krishna, they offered him emerald leaves, ruby flowers, and diamond studded fruits and nuts.
Instead of bathing Krishna with just dirty temple pond water, they decided to bathe him with milk, honey and coconut juice. The stench of this decaying syrup became the olfactory evidence of holiness of Hindu temples.
Just in case Krishna wanted to go for a ride to escape from the stench of temple, they built him a golden palanquin and a silver chariot.
Just in case some deranged atheist or fanatic of another religion attacked him during his sojourn they covered his chest with gold armor studded with precious stones.
They installed big diamonds in Krishna’s eyes to intimidate any impertinent Bhakta who dared to cast an evil eye on him.
To make Krishna feel quite at home, they plated the whole temple with gold.
For a fee the priests offered to place the lord’s crown on the head of Bhaktas. This became the ultimate symbol of dupe of Brahmanism.
5. Corrupted Bhagavatism Evolved Into Vaishnavism

Over the centuries, this thoroughly corrupted Bhagavatism evolved into Vaishnavism in which Krishna was reduced to being just one of nine Avataras of Vishnu. He now stood side by side with a fish (Matsya), a tortoise (Coorma), a pig (Varaha), a midget (Vamana), half-lion (Narasimha), a quintessential Kshatriya-hating Brahmin (Parashurama), and a quintessential Kshatriya king (Rama) and the Buddha. Vaishnavism in turn became a sect of a newly evolving inclusive Dharma, which foreigners labeled as Hinduism -that which is practiced by people living beyond the Sindhu (Indus) River. Brahmanism infiltrated this Dharma also, kept their doctrines of the Gunas and Karma alive and well; and promoted Varna, Jati and Kula Dharmas based on these discredited doctrines, if only to maintain their superiority among the four classes. They kept stigmatizing those born from Varnasankara (class admixture), which resulted in burgeoning of a whole class of untouchables. Today millions of these people, who go by the epithet of Dalits, suffer the same injustice in the hands of the upper classes as they did centuries ago.

6. The Business Of Temples

Today Hindu temples have become the hotbeds of moneymaking rituals of Brahmanism. Visit any of the famous temples of India, and you will see evidence of degradation of Hindu Dharma. The behavior of Hindu priests in these temples is despicable. The Tirupati temple is an example of this decadence par excellence. Here one can buy preferential viewing of the Lord’s idol by buying a special ticket. Krishna temple of Udupi is another classic example of corruption of Bhagavatism. Until recently, this temple forbade entrance to people of “lower classes.” Yet, the temple credits it fame to a “miracle” performed by a shepherd Bhaktiyogi by the name of Kanaka Dasa about four hundred years ago. If there was ever a god in these and other temples, he ran as far away as he could from them, and I won’t be surprised if he is now hiding on the Chinese side of the Himalayas! And now both the naïve and the crooked, the meek and the mighty, flock by the millions to these symbols of religious decadence in India.

7. Class And Caste System: A Slap In The Face To Krishna

The hallmark of Bhagavatism was egalitarianism. Because Bhagavatism destroyed the doctrines of the Gunas and Karma, Varna Dharma became irrelevant. However, Brahmins carefully hid this fundamental aspect of Bhagavatism from the public and continued to practice the Varna Dharma. Ignoring the egalitarian messages of both Upanishadic (5:18-19) and Bhagavata (9:29-33) parts of the Bhagavad Gita, they focused on the importance of continuing the class system and performing one’s Duty as per his class as enunciated in its Brahmanic part (18:42-45). They continued to harp on the dangers of class-admixture (Varnasankara, 1:38-44; 3:24), thus condemning millions of so-called outcastes to miserable life here on earth. They destroyed Krishna’s call to abandon all Dharma by declaring that it was meant for Arjuna and not for them!

The net result of all these tactics is that today Hinduism is steadily decaying just as Brahmanism did in the post-Vedic society. That is why today we see in India widespread Shokam (grief) in the disenfranchised; and Dwandwam (mental unrest) in the upper classes due to their entanglement with wealth and power; and obsession to gain these Karmaphalam by hook or by crook in almost everyone else.

In the next article, we will study how Shankaracharya singlehandedly revived Brahmanism from its deathbed by means of his duplicitous commentary on the Bhagavad Gita.

(To be continued)

Dr. Prabhakar Kamath, is a psychiatrist currently practicing in the U.S. He is the author of Servants, Not Masters: A Guide for Consumer Activists in India (1987) and Is Your Balloon About Pop?: Owner’s Manual for the Stressed Mind.

Share This Article: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.

Related posts:

The God of Gods Battles Brahmanism: Vaasudeva, Krishna and the Bhagavata Revolution
How Ashoka The Great Gave Brahmins A Song With Which They Conquered India
Secularism, Free-thought and the Internet Revolution- An Introduction
Upanishadists Create A New God To Beat Back Brahmanism
Upanishadists Use Arjuna Vishada To Overthrow Brahmanism
The Origins and Evolution of Brahmanism
Hindu Revisionism: Was Shankaracharya Deceptive Or Just Ignorant?
Legacy Of Ancient Religions Of India
The Legacy Of Brahmanism: Abomination of Untouchability And Curse Of Caste System
The Upanishads Attempt To Reform Brahmanism
The Decay of Dharma and the Rise of Adharma
The Gita Becomes The Battlefield For The Great Sectarian War
The Great Nastik Revolt

This post was written by:

Prabhakar Kamath - who has written 16 posts on Nirmukta.




Contact the author

« Are You A Freethinker? Naturalism, Life and Meaning in a Causal UniverseRationalists Rescue 12 Year Old Girl From Forced Marriage In Bankura, India »14 Responses to “Subterfuge: How Brahmins Destroyed The Bhagavata Revolution”
Aditya Soni says:
May 11, 2010 at 2:53 pm
Dear Dr Kamath,

A few days back I came to know about a journal on politics and religion.

http://www.politicsandreligionjournal.com

You might know of it. I was wondering if you could make some contributions there as well.

Reply
Trackbacks/Pingbacks
« Older Comments

Leave a Reply
Click here to cancel reply.

Name (required)

Mail (will not be published) (required)

Website(OpenID Enabled)
If you have an OpenID, you may fill it in here. If your OpenID provider provides a name and email, those values will be used instead of the values here. Learn more about OpenID or find an OpenID provider.



By posting your comment you are agreeing to comply with our commenting guidelines

Commenting Guidelines
Nirmukta reserves the right to reject, edit or delete any comment.
All comments are moderated and the content of each comment becomes the property of Nirmukta.
Plagiarism will not be tolerated. If you are quoting someone else, the source must be mentioned.
All comments must be respectful. Differentiate between ideas and people. People have feelings. Ideas don't. You may use abusive language within limits, reagarding how you feel about certain ideas. No such abuse will be tolerated in statements addressing people.
Comments containing hateful speech, intimating unlawful activity or making violent threats may not be published. These comments may be used as evidence in a court of law.
No sarcastic belittling of the author will be permitted. If you disagree, make your argument in a respectful way. You may attack the idea, not the author of that idea.
No trolling allowed. A troll is defined as someone who repeatedly provokes the author or other commenters with an intent to annoy and elicit an angry response. Such actions may include repeatedly making unsubstantiated accusations, and repeating the same criticism multiple times using different verbiage in the same thread.
Any unsubstantiated accusations of a serious nature will not be published. We publish reasoned arguments, and we expect the same from those criticizing our ideas.
No soliciting or promotion of any kind will be tolerated.
Comments once published may be taken down on request, at the discretion of Nirmukta.
Commenting may be closed for articles which are old or have a high number of comments.



Notify me of followup comments via e-mail

Popular Featured Comments Tags Subscribe Biocentrism Demystified: A Response to Deepak Chopra and Robert Lanza's Notion of a Conscious Universe
A Scientific View of the God Delusion and it's Implications
Scientists and God: The Indian Scenario
Karen Armstrong's 'The Case For God' (or) Why Science Makes My Head Hurt
Is 'Hindu Atheism' Valid? A Rationalist Critique Of The 'Hindu' Identity's Usurpation Of Indian Culture
Psychic Yoga Challenge: Yogi Ashwini Vs. Rationalists
How Ashoka The Great Gave Brahmins A Song With Which They Conquered India
COMPLEXITY EXPLAINED: 9. How Did Complex Molecules Like Proteins and DNA Emerge Spontaneously?
Reincarnation, Rebirth And Past-Life Regression Therapy In India: A Rationalist Critique
Review: The God Market- How Globalization Is Making India More Hindu, By Meera Nanda
Yogi In Politics: A Rationalist’s Thoughts On Baba Ramdev
Will Astrologer Bhaskar Shetty Keep His Word And Take Up The Rationalists’ Astrology Challenge?
Is The Virgin Mary Shedding Tears? Rationalists Investigate An Alleged Miracle in Kerala, India
Nirmukta Radio Podcast Episode #4: Interview - Blair Scott, Affiliate Director for American Atheists
First Meeting Of The Karnataka Rationalist Association in Bangalore on the 14th of March, 2010.
In Defence of Rationalism
Biocentrism Demystified: A Response to Deepak Chopra and Robert Lanza’s Notion of a Conscious Universe
Challenges Issued From Rationalists To Those Claiming Supernatural Powers In Nepal
Annual “Best Scientific Outlook Award” Ceremony And Rationalist Program
A Rational Approach to Understanding the Irrational Behavior of Indians
Lije: Don't you see the flaw in your argument? How stupi...
Aditya Soni: Dear Dr Kamath, A few days back I came to know ...
Aditya Soni: Mr Venkat, I agree with you with your statement...
Aditya Soni: Religions are meant cardinally for control and man...
Vijay Raj: Brahmins or Pandits are modern day Innovators.King...
astrology atheist Attacks Basava Brahmanism challenge Chopra Complexity Conference consciousness Darwin Deepak eclipse evolution explained Globalization God hindu hinduism India interview Islam Karnataka Krishna Mangalore Meera morality Nanda narendra Naturalism nayak Nirmukta Premanand Pseudoscience ramdev rationalism Rationalist rationalists religion Science P.O.V. superstition Tour Upanishads Women yoga Stay up to date

Subscribe to the RSS Feed
Subscribe to the feed via email
Our Flickr Photos - See all photos
Nirmukta Quiz!
Welcome to the quiz section on Nirmukta!
This month's quiz is on Homeopathy in India.









Click on Image

Astrologers Wanted
Nirmukta is looking for astrologers and astrology software to predict the year ahead for noted skeptics from around the world, as well as for the contributors at Nirmukta. If you are interested or have information that could help, please contact us using the form on the Contact Us page. We are interested in having Chinese, Western and Vedic astrologers demonstrate and prove to us the validity of their claims.
Indian CSICOP

Website for the Indian Committee For Scientific Investigation Of Claims Of The Paranormal.
Currently discussed topics on the Indian Atheists Forum
Irreverence and Indian Science Ashish Patil
I'm not a man, Nityananda told CID sleuths Ashish Patil
India is on a highway to Hell Richard Francis
13 Pandits arrested for Bangalore pub fire Ashish Patil
Blogroll
21 Century Revolution
Bigot Blog
Call for Investigation of Sai Baba
Cultural Naturalism Report
Fiery Scribe
Friendly Atheist
Indonesian Atheists
Me: Unlimited
Memeing Naturalism
New Age Crap
Nitwit Nastik
Rational Thoughts: Unlimited
Smiling Colours
The Church of the Churchless
The Hindu Atheist

Click on the image to join the Nirmukta facebook group!
Our Twitter Feed
Nirmukta Community forums: http://nirmukta.net , our new forums for Indian Freethinkers 2010/03/29
Rationalists investigate alleged miracle of Virgin Mary's tears in Kerala: http://tinyurl.com/ygoolev 2010/03/08
The Nirmukta facebook group has over 460 members and growing fast. Awesome! 2010/02/27
Reader Questions
Check out our Q & A section for advice and information from our panel of contributors and resident skeptics. You may use the Contact Form or email your questions to info@nirmukta.com. Anonymity is guaranteed on request.

Login
Username:


Password:



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Or login using an OpenID

Remember me



Register
Lost your password?

© 2009 Nirmukta. Powered by Wordpress.

1 comment:

  1. some part of this article are within the premises of logic and reason . while the latter part , where the author starts relating different practices to the sayings in bhagvat gita is far fetched. e.g. temples started having pond to bathe the idol of the deity. i think a well which is much cheap can meet this objective very well.Such statements need more historical analysis otherwise the article can be easily termed as orthodox. The fact is that temples used to have important resources at their disposal only for the sake having cash surplus account. Temples have been known to influence the political activities in a region using their economy prowess. The same thing happened in medieval europe to the churches. They used to have vast tracts of land , flocks and other ubiquitous resources for the upkeep of themselves in the time of peace and peril. Having said these things i must clarify that i am not trying to justify the deeds of the brahmans. All i mean is that the author may not have jumped to the far fetched conclusions in order to justify the evil deeds of the brahman

    ReplyDelete